SCHD's Low Fee Masks a Decade of Underperformance vs. S&P 500
SCHD's rock-bottom 0.06% expense ratio looks great, but a 38% performance gap over 10 years tells a different story.
You love SCHD for the dividend. The 6 basis point fee is practically free. But here's the number that should make you pause: a 38% performance gap versus the broader market over the past decade. That's not a rounding error — that's a decade of compounding working against you.
Dividend-focused ETFs like SCHD are built for income investors who want steady cash flow and lower volatility. That's a real and legitimate goal. But if you're younger, still in accumulation mode, or benchmarking yourself against the S&P 500, the total return picture looks a lot less flattering. A cheap fund that meaningfully trails the index isn't actually cheap when you do the math on opportunity cost.
Read more Prediction Markets Raise Insider Trading Red Flags for Wall Street →
The trap is letting a low expense ratio substitute for a performance conversation. Fees matter — nobody's arguing otherwise. But 0.06% on an asset that lags by 38% over ten years means you've optimized the wrong variable. You saved pennies on the fee and potentially left serious dollars on the table in growth.
None of this means SCHD is a bad fund. For retirees drawing income, or investors who genuinely need dividend yield to cover expenses, it does exactly what it's designed to do. The problem is when the fee becomes the headline and the return gap gets buried in the footnotes. Know what you own and why you own it — not just what it costs.
Continue reading at Yahoo Finance
